Elementary & Middle Schools Technical Assistance Center Logo
a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web pageMy Personal Page a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web page
List of Topics
List of Topics
Vote for a New Topic
a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web page

ESL Main Page

Executive Summary

Research Highlights

Models and Classroom Instruction

Case Study

Principles and Tips

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Definitions

a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web page
Communication
Linking Agent Directory
Online Chat
Bulletin Board
a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web page
Journal
Write to My Journal
Send Us EmailPublic Homepage

ESL Icon

ESL
English Language Development / English as a Second Language


a transparent image used to ensure positioning on the web page

Definitions

BICS/CALP
Cummins (1981) argues that individuals develop two types of language proficiency: basic interpersonal language skills (BICS) and cognitive academic language proficiency, (CALP)
. He suggests that these two types of proficiency vary according to the degree of context available to the student, and the degree of cognitive challenge of the task. BICS can be acquired in 1 to 2 years, but CALP, the level of proficiency needed to read social studies texts or solve mathematics word problems, can take 5 to 7 years to develop. CALP is directly related to cognition and many aspects of academic achievement. Three main propositions of CALP include: (1) CALP can be distinguished from interpersonal communicative skills such as accent and fluency in both the first and second languages, (2) The same underlying cognitive dimension is responsible for CALP proficiencies in both the first and second language, (3) Because the same dimension underlies CALP in both the first and second language, older language learners, whose language proficiency is better developed, will tend to acquire CALP more rapidly than younger learners.

Cultural congruence
indicates a teacher's respect for the cultural background of his or her students. Zeichner (1995) emphasizes that in order for a teacher to implement the principle of cultural congruence, he or she must have knowledge of and respect for the various cultural traditions and languages of students in the classroom. Teachers need general sociocultural knowledge about child and adolescent development; about second language acquisition; about the ways that socioeconomic circumstances, language, and culture shape school performance. Finally, teachers should develop a clear sense of their own ethnic and cultural identities in order to be able to understand and appreciate those of their students. This will help them understand how their own cultural biases may influence judgements about student performance and obstruct students' ability to learn.

Direct Instruction
is a highly structured program that tests and retests what children are learning, always corrects them when they err, and tries to leave nothing to chance. It groups children according to ability, but tries to ensure all children learn the basics. Direct instruction almost died out in the late 1980s, when the California school board removed it from the approved state curriculum in favor of the then-fashionable whole language and whole math, which place a higher premium on building student self-esteem than on answering the question correctly. However, advocates of direct instruction say self-esteem takes care of itself, since children feel encouraged as they realize they are capable of acquiring basic skills. Teachers who employ direct instruction report that it helps greatly with student discipline, since they are less likely to misbehave as they enjoy the challenges the system provides

Instructional Conversation
This model was intended to increase students' language use during reading instruction, and was expected to positively impact students' knowledge of story structure and ability to elaborate on stories read and discussed.

Strategy Feedback
is instruction based upon a pretest students take. Teachers are then taught to offer feedback to students that addresses students' pretest errors and statements in class.

back to top

 

 


EMSTAC
1000 Thomas Jefferson St., NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: (202) 944-5300
TTY: 1-877-334-3499
Fax: (202) 944-5454